SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification
11 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification (2017)Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews r…Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported (2014)Survey of new 2007 and 2011 C…Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability (2014)Outcomes in Cochrane Systemat…Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Evidence for the Selective Re…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’ (2014)Core Outcome Measures in Effe…Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review (2014)Choosing Important Health Out…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)OMERACT: An international ini…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth (2015)Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. (1998)Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes (2012)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis (2017)Collecting data (2019)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement (2018)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)Innovations in Data Collection, Management, and Archiving for Systematic Reviews (2015)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy (2017)Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study) (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 2007OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology536 cited
  • 2014Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review338 cited
  • 2014Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’332 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials187 cited
  • 2014Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability120 cited
  • 2014Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported44 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work