SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The distribution of P -values in medical research articles suggested selective reporting associated with statistical significance
11 references·6 citing·39 second hop
The distribution of P -values in medical research articles suggested selective reporting associated with statistical significance (2017)The distribution of P -values in medical …Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Evolution of Reporting P Valu…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false (2013)Discussion: Why "An estimate …Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek (2013)Discussion: An estimate of th…An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature (2013)An estimate of the science-wi…A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05 (2012)A peculiar prevalence of p va…Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross sectional study (2006)Believability of relative ris…Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Factors Influencing Publicati…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Publication Bias: A Problem i…Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication Decisions and the…Statistically significant results from low-power analyses: A comedy of errors (2026)Statistically significant res…Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model (2024)Impact of redefining statisti…The reporting of p values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997–2017) (2021)The reporting of p values, co…P in the right place: Revisiting the evidential value of P‐values (2018)P in the right place: Revisit…Consequences of relying on statistical significance: Some illustrations (2018)Consequences of relying on st…The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years (2017)The Conduct and Reporting of …The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement (1996)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)An Exchange: Part I : Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes (1994)… and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns (2015)Epidemiology Faces Its Limits (1995)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals (2011)A surge of p -values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) (2015)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Distributions of p -values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on? (2016)Problems in using p -curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p -hacking and evidential value (2016)The Prevalence of Marginally Significant Results in Psychology Over Time (2019)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Improving the Dependability of Research in Personality and Social Psychology (2013)The Chrysalis Effect (2014)What’s in a p? Reassessing best practices for conducting and reporting hypothesis-testing research (2017)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review (2017)P values in display items are ubiquitous and almost invariably significant: A survey of top science journals (2018)Emerging Trends: SOTA-Chasing (2022)Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. (1975)A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder (2010)An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa964 cited
  • 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
  • 1988Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data814 cited
  • 2016Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015370 cited
  • 2012A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05266 cited
  • 2013An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature180 cited
  • 2006Believability of relative risks and odds ratios in abstracts: cross sectional study84 cited
  • 2013Discussion: Why "An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature" is false60 cited
  • 2013Discussion: An estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and applications to top medical journals by Jager and Leek54 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Consequences of relying on statistical significance: Some illustrations44 cited
  • 2017The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years41 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

P in the right place: Revisiting the evidential value of P‐values
31 cited
  • 2024Impact of redefining statistical significance on P-hacking and false positive rates: An agent-based model7 cited
  • 2026Statistically significant results from low-power analyses: A comedy of errors7 cited
  • 2021The reporting of p values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997–2017)7 cited