SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Who benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleWho benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why?

Antje Proske2017

Article2017

Who benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why?

Antje Proske · Hermann Körndle · Susanne Narciss

23 citations·0/0 files stored·Instructional Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching 1998Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition 2013Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques 2014The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes 2019Advances in Instructional Psychology 1994Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding 1994Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups 1987Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.

Cited by

2019What students do when encountering failure in collaborative tasks

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Individual preparation for collaborative learning: Systematic review and synthesisreview · 36 shared references 2015Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learningarticle · 11 shared references 2015Learning as a Generative Activitybook · 11 shared references 2015Learning as a Generative Activity: Eight Learning Strategies that Promote Understandingbook · 10 shared references 2018The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering conceptsarticle · 10 shared references 2019Collaborative Learningchapter · 10 shared references

Details

Year2017

Typearticle

Published2017-04-21

VenueInstructional Science

ISSN-L0020-4277

Languageen

Citations23

Files0 public / 0

ShelfInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11251-017-9411-7

openalex_workW2605470076

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.