Rethinking digital preservation: definitions, models, and requirements

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to clarify a mechanism for determining the robustness of digital preservation options given that the field has matured and contains a number of alternatives. Design/methodology/approach By examining the component activities of digital preservation, the open archival information system (OAIS) reference model and the trustworthy repository certification process, this paper outlines a possible new model for evaluating the caliber of any particular digital preservation mechanism. Findings This paper offers a more ordered and prescriptive model for evaluating digital preservation efforts. Research limitations/implications As a review of the OAIS reference model is underway, this paper seeks to contribute to that ongoing discussion to address several issues lacking in the current model and its effect on the certification process. Originality/value This paper identifies weaknesses in current practices and offers a model for addressing them.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.