SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Scotland's Bastard Verdict: Intermediacy and the Unique Three-Verdict System · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleScotland's Bastard Verdict: Intermediacy and the Unique Three-Verdict System

Unknown author2005

OA

Articlediamond2005

Scotland's Bastard Verdict: Intermediacy and the Unique Three-Verdict System

Unknown author

31 citations·0/0 files stored·Indiana international & comparative law review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

The author would like to

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 31 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2007A third verdict option: Exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.2018The bastard verdict and its influence on jurors 2021A Modern History of the Not Proven Verdict 2021Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors 2022Justice In-Between

Details

Year2005

Typearticle

Published2005-01-03

VenueIndiana international & comparative law review

ISSN-L1061-4982

Languageen

Citations31

Files0 public / 0

ShelfLegal processes and jurisprudence

Identifiers

doi10.18060/17848

openalex_workW2606730622

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.