SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Gaps exist in the current guidance on the use of randomized controlled trial study protocols in systematic reviews
16 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Gaps exist in the current guidance on the use of randomized controlled trial study protocols in systematic reviews (2017)Gaps exist in the current guidance on the…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review (2015)Inadequate use and regulation…Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? (2014)Searching ClinicalTrials.gov …Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis (2014)Clinical trials registries ar…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …“Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method (2013)“Best fit” framework synthesi…Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications (2012)Trial Registration Numbers Ar…Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review (2012)Guidelines for randomized cli…Establishing a new journal for systematic review products (2012)Establishing a new journal fo…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Inadequate diversity of information resources searched in US-affiliated systematic reviews and meta-analyses: 2005–2016 (2018)Inadequate diversity of infor…Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Beyond PICO (2012)Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings (2017)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2013“Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method647 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2012Establishing a new journal for systematic review products244 cited
  • 2012Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review81 cited
  • 2012Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications79 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014
Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches?
75 cited
  • 2014Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis61 cited
  • 2015Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review46 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Inadequate diversity of information resources searched in US-affiliated systematic reviews and meta-analyses: 2005–20167 cited