SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Influence of Reviewer Interaction Network on Long-Term Citations: A Case Study of the Scientific Peer-Review System of the Journal of High Energy Physics
16 references·2 citing·54 second hop
Influence of Reviewer Interaction Network on Long-Term Citations: A Case Study of the Scientific Peer-Review System of the Journal of High Energy Physics (2017)Influence of Reviewer Interaction Network…The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 (2015)The Development and Psychomet…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewTowards quality discourse in online news comments (2011)Towards quality discourse in …Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics (2010)Estimating the Helpfulness an…Scientific Journal Publishing: Yearly Volume and Open Access Availability. (2009)Scientific Journal Publishing…Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment (2009)Creating Effective Collaborat…Information quality work organization in wikipedia (2008)Information quality work orga…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Editorial peer review for imp…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Measuring the Quality of Edit…Peer Review (1994)Peer ReviewThe Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)The Philosophical Basis of Pe…The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review (1990)The Effects of Blinding on th…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …Peer review in biomedical publication (1974)Peer review in biomedical pub…Cultural distance, gender and praise in peer review (2024)Cultural distance, gender and…Quantifying the online long-term interest in research (2022)Quantifying the online long-t…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies (2009)PRISMA Statement (2010)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)The History of the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle (1970)Chase, Chance, and Creativity (1978)The History of Lithium Therapy (1984)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Peer Review and the Support of Science (1977)Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. (1979)Which researcher will get the grant? (1979)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2001)Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? (2004)The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews (2006)Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content (2013)What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites (2014)Mining meaning from online ratings and reviews: Tourist satisfaction analysis using latent dirichlet allocation (2016)Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. (1984)Data quality in context (1997)The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect (2001)Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design (2015)Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? (2016)‘You really have to have a thick skin’: A cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists (2018)The Chronicle of Higher Education (1977)Becoming a critically reflective teacher (1996)Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom (1999)Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? (2012)Online Education and Its Effective Practice: A Research Review (2016)Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course (2017)Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. (1988)Introduction to functional grammar . By M. A. K. Halliday London & Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 1985. Pp. xxxv, 387. (1989)Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation (1991)Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment (2010)Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) (2012)Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption (2016)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC20151,743 cited
  • 2010Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics1,404 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?1,147 cited
  • 2012Bias in peer review1,111 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals814 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 2009Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment588 cited
  • 1990The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation436 cited
  • 2011Towards quality discourse in online news comments342 cited
  • 2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies316 cited
  • 1994Peer Review280 cited
  • 1990The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review267 cited
  • 2008Information quality work organization in wikipedia250 cited
  • 1974Peer review in biomedical publication241 cited
  • 2002Measuring the Quality of Editorial Peer Review230 cited
  • 2009Scientific Journal Publishing: Yearly Volume and Open Access Availability.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

193 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Quantifying the online long-term interest in research6 cited
  • 2024Cultural distance, gender and praise in peer review5 cited