SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture treatment for vascular dementia
16 references·2 citing·48 second hopsampled
Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture treatment for vascular dementia (2017)Assessing the quality of reports about ra…Quality of reporting and its correlates among randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for cancer pain: application of the CONSORT 2010 Statement and STRICTA (2013)Quality of reporting and its …Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Sarcomas (2011)Quality of Randomized Control…Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010)Revised STandards for Reporti…Revised Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (Stricta): Extending the Consort Statement (2010)Revised Standards for Reporti…Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument (2010)Randomized Controlled Trials …CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version) (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Reporting of Safety Results i…Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature (2008)Quality of Reporting of Rando…Correction: Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2008)Correction: Reported Methodol…Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Primary Treatment of Brain Tumors (2006)Quality of Randomized Control…In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials (2002)In the dark The reporting of …Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. (2001)Completeness of safety report…Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies (2000)Assessing the potential for b…Do acupuncture trials have lower risk of bias over the last five decades? A methodological study of 4 715 randomized controlled trials (2020)Do acupuncture trials have lo…A Review of Adherence and Predictors of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the Reporting of Tuberculosis Vaccine Trials (2020)A Review of Adherence and Pre…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (1999)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis (1995)Investigation of within‐study selective reporting in clinical research: follow‐up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee (2002)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trials (2008)Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies (2023)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: A meta‐epidemiologic study (2009)Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling (2012)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review (2016)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomised trials (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2015)CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration (2015)Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials with Traditional Chinese Medicine 2018: Recommendations, Explanation and Elaboration (SPIRIT-TCM Extension 2018) (2018)From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature (2011)Reporting Quality of Social and Psychological Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting Guidelines and Trial Publications (2013)The Immigrant and Hispanic Paradoxes (2013)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension (2020)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 2010Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement1,391 cited
  • 2001Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.564 cited
  • 2010Revised Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (Stricta): Extending the Consort Statement299 cited
  • 2009Reporting of Safety Results in Published Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials285 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version)248 cited
  • 2002In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials173 cited
  • 2000Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies123 cited
  • 2006Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Primary Treatment of Brain Tumors95 cited
  • 2008Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Endocrinology Literature87 cited
  • 2008Correction: Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

85 cited
  • 2011Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Sarcomas50 cited
  • 2010Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument46 cited
  • 2013Quality of reporting and its correlates among randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for cancer pain: application of the CONSORT 2010 Statement and STRICTA33 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Do acupuncture trials have lower risk of bias over the last five decades? A methodological study of 4 715 randomized controlled trials16 cited
    • 2020A Review of Adherence and Predictors of Adherence to the CONSORT Statement in the Reporting of Tuberculosis Vaccine Trials16 cited