SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rapid reviews for evidence synthesis
16 references·0 citing·39 second hopsampled
Rapid reviews for evidence synthesis (2017)Rapid reviews for evidence synthesisQuality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines (2016)Quality of conduct and report…La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)La extensión de la declaració…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods (2015)Rapid review programs to supp…An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods (2015)An international survey and m…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2014)RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APP…Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: taking stock and moving forward (2013)Rapid evidence assessments of…What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments (2012)What is a rapid review? A met…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment (2008)Rapid reviews versus full sys…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews in the soc…The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1985)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES (2003)End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact (2005)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist (2019)Use of Meditation and Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for the Treatment of Stress, Depression and Anxiety in Students. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2019)Well-Being and Romantic Relationships: A Systematic Review in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement65,829 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide4,089 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,246 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,162 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2016La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA618 cited
  • 2008Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment236 cited
  • 2016Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines152 cited
  • 2012What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments143 cited
  • 2015Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods141 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2014RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT139 cited
  • 2015An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods132 cited
  • 2013Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: taking stock and moving forward122 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.