SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Striving for transparent and credible research: practical guidelines for behavioral ecologists
16 references·6 citing·40 second hop
Striving for transparent and credible research: practical guidelines for behavioral ecologists (2017)Striving for transparent and credible res…Good enough practices in scientific computing. (2017)Good enough practices in scie…The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)How open science helps resear…Detecting and avoiding likely false‐positive findings – a practical guide (2016)Detecting and avoiding likely…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How to Make More Published Re…Best Practices for Scientific Computing (2014)Best Practices for Scientific…Value all research products (2013)Value all research productsMeasuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)An Open, Large-Scale, Collabo…A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories (2012)A Vast Graveyard of Undead Th…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyBelieve it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Believe it or not: how much c…Publish your computer code: it is good enough (2010)Publish your computer code: i…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Characterising reproducibility debt in scientific software: A systematic literature review (2024)Characterising reproducibilit…Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts (2023)Do open science badges work? …Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis (2023)Advice for improving the repr…Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy (2018)Systematic reviews and maps a…Curating Research Assets: A Tutorial on the Git Version Control System (2018)Curating Research Assets: A T…Continuous Reproducibility in GNSS Signal Processing (2018)Continuous Reproducibility in…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. (2018)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Scientific Utopia (2012)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. (1983)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The New Statistics (2013)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools (2017)A Large-Scale Study About Quality and Reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,561 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2016How open science helps researchers succeed790 cited
  • 2014How to Make More Published Research True757 cited
  • 2014Best Practices for Scientific Computing715 cited
  • 2012An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science614 cited
  • 2012A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories603 cited
  • 2017Good enough practices in scientific computing.452 cited
  • 2016Detecting and avoiding likely false‐positive findings – a practical guide435 cited
  • 2013Value all research products397 cited
  • 2010Publish your computer code: it is good enough

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

315 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy70 cited
  • 2018Curating Research Assets: A Tutorial on the Git Version Control System28 cited
  • 2023Advice for improving the reproducibility of data extraction in meta‐analysis20 cited
  • 2023Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts19 cited
  • 2018Continuous Reproducibility in GNSS Signal Processing13 cited
  • 2024Characterising reproducibility debt in scientific software: A systematic literature review9 cited