SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
PRISMA statement and PROSPERO
3 references·1 citing·14 second hop
PRISMA statement and PROSPERO (2017)PRISMA statement and PROSPEROCochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods (2013)Cochrane methods - twenty yea…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Family Socioeconomic Position and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis and a Mendelian Randomization Study (2022)Family Socioeconomic Position…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research (2018)Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey (2021)Shifting online during COVID-19: A systematic review of teaching and learning strategies and their outcomes (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2013Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods136 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Family Socioeconomic Position and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis and a Mendelian Randomization Study16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work