SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews
11 references·7 citing·36 second hop
A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews (2017)A competency framework for librarians inv…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Reproducibility of Search Str…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Information Competence of a Library Specialist as a Condition for Their Professional Development (2016)Information Competence of a L…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …The Systematic Review Team: Contributions of the Health Sciences Librarian (2011)The Systematic Review Team: C…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Evidence Synthesis Instructional Offerings in Library and Information Science Programs (2024)Evidence Synthesis Instructio…Teaching Knowledge Synthesis Methods through Online Research Consultations (2023)Teaching Knowledge Synthesis …Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Reviews and Reviewing: Approa…A decade of systematic reviews: an assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine's systematic review service (2023)A decade of systematic review…An Exploration of Business Librarian Participation in Knowledge Synthesis Reviews (2022)An Exploration of Business Li…Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report (2021)Addressing challenges with sy…Reproducibility of search strategies of non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study (2019)Reproducibility of search str…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors (2015)Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval (2019)Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Systematic Reviews and Librarians: A Primer for Managers (2015)Using Sandelowski and Barroso’s Meta-Synthesis Method in Advancing Qualitative Evidence (2015)The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks (2018)Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: Issues, challenges and opportunities (2022)PRISMA for Review of Management Literature – Method, Merits, and Limitations – An Academic Review (2023)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews330 cited
  • 2016Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study107 cited
  • 2011The Systematic Review Team: Contributions of the Health Sciences Librarian57 cited
  • 2016Information Competence of a Library Specialist as a Condition for Their Professional Development3 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Reproducibility of search strategies of non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals is suboptimal: primary methodological study19 cited
  • 2023Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

18 cited
  • 2022An Exploration of Business Librarian Participation in Knowledge Synthesis Reviews13 cited
  • 2021Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: a case report13 cited
  • 2023A decade of systematic reviews: an assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine's systematic review service11 cited
  • 2023Teaching Knowledge Synthesis Methods through Online Research Consultations1 cited
  • 2024Evidence Synthesis Instructional Offerings in Library and Information Science Programs1 cited