Global Commodity Governance: State Responses to Sustainable Forest and Fisheries Certification

Fred Peter Gale · Marcus Haward

70 citations0/0 files storedeCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Global trade, sustainability, and social impact Forest Management and Policy Regulation and Compliance Studies

Abstract

Commodity Governance in a Globalising World Global Commodities, Sustainable Governance: An Analytic Framework The Forest Stewardship Council and the Marine Stewardship Council Forests and Fisheries Management in Comparative Perspective Forest and Fisheries Certification in Australia Forest and Fisheries Certification in Canada Forest and Fisheries Certification in the United Kingdom Comparative Analysis of State Responses to FSC and MSC Conclusion

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2012National Government Responses to Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Fisheries Certification: Insights from Atlantic Canada 2015Reinserting state agency in global value chains: The case of MSC certified skipjack tuna 2019Hybrid governance in aquaculture: Certification schemes and third party accreditation 2021Sustainable commodity governance and the global south 2013Forest certification with Chinese characteristics: state engagement with non-state market-driven governance 2014Governing the Organic Cocoa Network from G hana: Towards Hybrid Governance Arrangements?2022Certifying China

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.