This article features an interdisciplinary debate and dialogue about the nature of mind, perception, and rationality.Scholars from a range of disciplines-cognitive science, applied and experimental psychology, behavioral economics, and biology-offer critiques and commentaries of a target article by Felin, Koenderink, and Krueger (2017): "Rationality, Perception, and the All-Seeing Eye," Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.The commentaries raise a number of criticisms and issues concerning rationality and the all-seeing-eye argument, including the nature of judgment and reasoning, biases versus heuristics, organism-environment relations, perception and situational construal, equilibrium analysis in economics, efficient markets, and the nature of empirical observation and the scientific method.The debated topics have far-reaching consequences for the rationality literature specifically, as well as for the cognitive, psychological, and economic sciences more broadly.The commentaries are followed by a response from the authors of the target article.Their response is organized around three central issues: (1) the problem of cues; ( 2) what is the question?; and (3) equilibria, $500 bills, and the axioms of rationality.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 77 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.