SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientists and science communication: a Danish survey
1 references·13 citing·48 second hop
Scientists and science communication: a Danish survey (2007)Scientists and science communication: a D…Attention Cycles and Frames in the Plant Biotechnology Debate (2006)Attention Cycles and Frames i…Web-based science communication at Research Institute level: balancing dissemination, dialogue and promotion in a major Italian scientific institution (2024)Web-based science communicati…Geoscientists' views about science communication: predicting willingness to communicate geoscience (2023)Geoscientists' views about sc…Bringing back the debate on mediated and unmediated science communication: the public's perspective (2021)Bringing back the debate on m…How to get your feet wet in public engagement: Perspectives from freshwater scientists (2020)How to get your feet wet in p…Denmark, Norway and Sweden: Share, make useful and critically discuss: Science communication (2020)Denmark, Norway and Sweden: S…La publicación de noticias sobre los resultados de I+D+i. ¿Cómo es percibida por los investigadores españoles? (2018)La publicación de noticias so…HESS Opinions: Science in today's media landscape – challenges and lessons from hydrologists and journalists (2018)HESS Opinions: Science in tod…KRİTİK OLAYLAR, POLİTİK DOKÜMANLAR, RAPORLAR VE ARAŞTIRMALAR IŞIĞINDA TÜRKİYE’DE BİLİM İLETİŞİMİ (2017)KRİTİK OLAYLAR, POLİTİK DOKÜM…The science-media interaction in biomedical research in the Netherlands. Opinions of scientists and journalists on the science-media relationship (2015)The science-media interaction…Meet the Scientist: The Value of Short Interactions Between Scientists and Students (2015)Meet the Scientist: The Value…A Blueprint for Public Engagement Appraisal: Supporting Research Careers (2015)A Blueprint for Public Engage…Scientists' attitudes toward a dialogue with the public: a study using "science cafes" (2011)Scientists' attitudes toward …Les relations entre les scientifiques et la société (2010)Les relations entre les scien…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Scale Development : Theory and Applications (1991)Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? (2006)Broadening the audience for science engagement with machine-learning techniques (2024)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support program on scientists’ outreach attitudes and practices (2018)Does the messenger matter? Studying the impacts of scientists and engineers interacting with public audiences at science festival events (2019)Scientist of the week: evaluating effects of a teacher-led STEM intervention to reduce stereotypical views of scientists in young children (2021)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach (1989)Agendas and instability in American politics (1993)Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology (2006)Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries (2013)The Partisan Brain (2015)Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (1987)The theory of planned behavior (1991)The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections (2011)Blending Research, Journalism, and Community Expertise: A Case Study of Coproduction in Research Communication (2020)``It's my job'': a qualitative study of the mediatization of science within the scientist-journalist relationship (2023)The KJ Method: A Technique for Analyzing Data Derived from Japanese Ethnology (1997)What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities? (2007)Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research (2009)L'Expérimentarium et les bibliothèques (2014)Motivations and barriers for young scientists to engage with society: perspectives from South Africa (2022)When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions (2010)Misinformation and Its Correction (2012)The Slow Professor (2016)Las redes sociales como vehículo del periodismo científico: 'Scoping Review' (2023)The importance, significance, and relevance of communication: a fourth study of the criticality of the discipline’s content and pedagogy (2023)The Public and its Problems (1927)Science: The Endless Frontier (1945)Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making (1999)Communicating Science: Heterogeneous, Multiform and Polysemic (2021)Science stories: researchers’ experiences of writing science communication and the implications for training future scientists (2022)What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda (2007)The 95 Percent Solution (2010)Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research (2015)Elevate your work through incorporation of public engagement (2020)Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press (2004)Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators (2013)Taking Stock and Re-Examining the Role of Science Communication (2021)Balancing interests between freedom and censorship: Organizational strategies for quality assurance in science communication (2022)Training researchers and planning science communication and dissemination activities: testing the QUEST model in practice and theory (2023)Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition (2003)Bridging science and art: Auralization and visualization of the ocean soundscape (2024)Profiling the geoscience community: exploring patterns of science communication and public engagement (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Attention Cycles and Frames in the Plant Biotechnology Debate242 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Meet the Scientist: The Value of Short Interactions Between Scientists and Students68 cited
  • 2011Scientists' attitudes toward a dialogue with the public: a study using "science cafes"29 cited
  • 2020Denmark, Norway and Sweden: Share, make useful and critically discuss: Science communication26 cited
  • 2015The science-media interaction in biomedical research in the Netherlands. Opinions of scientists and journalists on the science-media relationship19 cited
  • 2010Les relations entre les scientifiques et la société14 cited
  • 2021Bringing back the debate on mediated and unmediated science communication: the public's perspective14 cited
  • 2018HESS Opinions: Science in today's media landscape – challenges and lessons from hydrologists and journalists12 cited
  • 2020How to get your feet wet in public engagement: Perspectives from freshwater scientists12 cited
  • 2023Geoscientists' views about science communication: predicting willingness to communicate geoscience11 cited
  • 2017KRİTİK OLAYLAR, POLİTİK DOKÜMANLAR, RAPORLAR VE ARAŞTIRMALAR IŞIĞINDA TÜRKİYE’DE BİLİM İLETİŞİMİ11 cited
  • 2015A Blueprint for Public Engagement Appraisal: Supporting Research Careers5 cited
  • 2024Web-based science communication at Research Institute level: balancing dissemination, dialogue and promotion in a major Italian scientific institution

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

4 cited
  • 2018La publicación de noticias sobre los resultados de I+D+i. ¿Cómo es percibida por los investigadores españoles?4 cited