SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for…Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Standards for Reporting Quali…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Defining consensus: A systema…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN checklist for asse…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Core outcome domains for chro…Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)Linking clinical variables wi…Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of Life (1995)Linking Clinical Variables Wi…Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)Reporting results of cancer t…Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis (1980)Measurement of patient outcom…COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)COSMIN guideline for systemat…The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on intimate partner violence and mental health: advancing mental health services, research, and policy (2022)The Lancet Psychiatry Commiss…Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols (2022)Guidelines for Reporting Outc…Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol (2021)Developing a reporting guidel…Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability (2020)Comparison of different ratin…The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis (2019)The impact of patient-reporte…Key attributes of integrated community-based youth service hubs for mental health: a scoping review (2019)Key attributes of integrated …Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis (2019)Defining the criteria for inc…Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research (2019)Core outcomes in neonatology:…Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement (2019)Core Outcome Set-STAndardised…No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation (2018)No Surgical Innovation Withou…Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop (2018)Implementing core outcomes in…Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)Higher number of items associ…A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm) (2018)A Core Outcome Set for Multim…Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)Core Outcome Set-STAndards fo…A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)A taxonomy has been developed…Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)A methodological framework for assessing health indices (1985)Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life (1989)Methods for assessing responsiveness (2000)the delphi method: techniques and applications (1975)Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it? (2015)Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review (2017)The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness (2021)An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2011)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing (2017)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Self-rated health status as a health measure: The predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population (1997)The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content (2010)Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? (2016)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2014Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research12,156 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 1981Reporting results of cancer treatment7,798 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 1980Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis4,391 cited
  • 2010The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study4,259 cited
  • 2014Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies3,720 cited
  • 1995Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes3,497 cited
  • 2003Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations3,496 cited
  • 1995Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of Life3,027 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2015Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data2,123 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,544 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations791 cited
    • 2017A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery623 cited
    • 2024COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0459 cited
    • 2018No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation395 cited
    • 2021Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol331 cited
    • 2022The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on intimate partner violence and mental health: advancing mental health services, research, and policy310 cited
    • 2019Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis306 cited
    • 2022Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols288 cited
    • 2018Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys266 cited
    • 2019Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement266 cited
    • 2019Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research235 cited
    • 2018A Core Outcome Set for Multimorbidity Research (COSmm)220 cited
    • 2018Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop196 cited
    • 2019The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis194 cited
    • 2020Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability185 cited
    • 2019Key attributes of integrated community-based youth service hubs for mental health: a scoping review172 cited