Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice?

8 references·5 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
1982Variations in Medical Care among Small Areas824 cited
2001Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery190 cited

Cited by

2011Level of Evidence in Four Selected Rehabilitation Journals22 cited
2011Hierarchy of evidence relating to hand surgery in Brazilian orthopedic journals21 cited
2014Description of research design of articles published in four Brazilian physical therapy journals17 cited
2012CHARACTERISTICS OF GLOBAL PUBLICATIONS ABOUT WRIST ARTHROSCOPY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS12 cited
2010Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados na ortopedia e traumatologia: avaliação sistemática da evidência nacional11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work