Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An assessment of differences in costs and health benefits of serology and NAT screening of donations for blood transfusion in different Western countries

7 references·2 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Principles of Good Practice for Decision Analytic Modeling in Health-Care Evaluation: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices—Modeling Studies1,170 cited
2012Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6716 cited
2009Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: Key challenges and recommendations321 cited
2009Infectivity of human immunodeficiency virus‐1, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus and risk of transmission by transfusion221 cited
2013Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus RNA and antibody in first‐time, lapsed, and repeat blood donations across five international regions and relative efficacy of alternative screening scenarios50 cited
2011Risk‐based decision‐making for blood safety: preliminary report of a consensus conference38 cited
2009BLOOD DONORS AND BLOOD COLLECTION: Web interface–supported transmission risk assessment and cost‐effectiveness analysis of postdonation screening: a global model applied to Ghana, Thailand, and the Netherlands31 cited

Cited by

2021An international comparison of HIV prevalence and incidence in blood donors and general population: a BEST Collaborative study13 cited
2020Quality and safety measures in transfusion practice: The experience of eight southern/eastern Mediterranean countries9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work