Toward a Social Theory of Argumentation

G. Thomas Goodnight

20 citations0/0 files storedArgumentation and Advocacy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Rhetoric and Communication Studies Critical Theory and Philosophy

Abstract

Although Willard's insights that technical reason and public deliberation reciprocally inform and define one another are to some extent affirmed, the project of critical analysis of argument spheres is a very different project than Willard envisions and critical analysis is essential for generating a social theory of argumentation. The independence and integrity of the spheres project is argued against Willard's various substitutions and amendments.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

2005The theory of communicative action 1976The Great War and Modern Memory 1974The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964)1989The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs.1982Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research.1974Complete Sherlock Holmes 1953Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge 1975Where Is Argument?

Cited by

2002Rhetorical pedagogy as a postal system: Circulating subjects through Michael Warner's “publics and Counterpublics”

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.