SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Are You Sure You Want to Do That? Fostering the Responsible Conduct of Medical Education Research
15 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Are You Sure You Want to Do That? Fostering the Responsible Conduct of Medical Education Research (2017)Are You Sure You Want to Do That? Fosteri…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Responsible Conduct of Research Education (What, Why, and Does It Work?) (2016)Responsible Conduct of Resear…Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How to Make More Published Re…Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published (2014)Data dredging, salami-slicing…Perspective (2012)PerspectiveMeasuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Do U.S. Research Institutions Meet or Exceed Federal Mandates for Instruction in Responsible Conduct of Research? A National Survey (2012)Do U.S. Research Institutions…Publishing Ethics in Medical Education Journals (2009)Publishing Ethics in Medical …How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students (2009)Graduate Socialization in the…The History, Purpose, and Future of Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research (2007)The History, Purpose, and Fut…The CITI Program: An International Online Resource for Education in Human Subjects Protection and the Responsible Conduct of Research (2007)The CITI Program: An Internat…Expanding Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction across the University (2007)Expanding Responsible Conduct…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyExperimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Learning Styles (2008)Practical significance: Moving beyond statistical significance (2015)Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors’ Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review (2017)Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender (2018)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research (2006)International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees (2010)Scientific Diversity Interventions (2014)Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education (2016)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The natural selection of bad science (2016)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)The cheating culture: why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead (2004)The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships (2007)Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct (2013)The Gray Zone: Questionable Research Practices in the Business School (2016)The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ (2017)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century (2016)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)Rescuing Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education (2013)Research Integrity and Misconduct in the Academic Profession (2013)A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach (2017)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 2014How to Make More Published Research True757 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2007The History, Purpose, and Future of Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research171 cited
  • 2014Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published111 cited
  • 2012Perspective102 cited
  • 2007The CITI Program: An International Online Resource for Education in Human Subjects Protection and the Responsible Conduct of Research98 cited
  • 2012Do U.S. Research Institutions Meet or Exceed Federal Mandates for Instruction in Responsible Conduct of Research? A National Survey63 cited
  • 2009Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students58 cited
  • 2007Expanding Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction across the University34 cited
  • 2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Responsible Conduct of Research Education (What, Why, and Does It Work?)
23 cited
  • 2009Publishing Ethics in Medical Education Journals17 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.