Newspaper Excellence: How Editors of Small & Large Papers Judge Quality

George Albert Gladney

34 citations0/0 files storedNewspaper Research Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Journalism and Media Studies Publishing and Scholarly Communication Media Studies and Communication

Abstract

Editors do share common values, regardless of the size of their papers. But this study of 257 editors shows that editors of smaller papers evaluate newspaper excellence differently than do their big-paper counterparts.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2017Covering Mass Shootings 2006What Makes Journalism “Excellent”? Criteria Identified by Judges in Two Leading Awards Programs 2021Disseminator, Watchdog and Neighbor?: Positioning Local Journalism in the 2018 #FreePress Editorials Campaign 2020Predicting Audience-Rated News Quality: Using Survey, Text Mining, and Neural Network Methods 1997A descriptive look at the public role of Australian independent alternative press 2015Transforming the news value chain in the social era: a community perspective 2013A study of US online community journalists and their organizational characteristics and story generation routines 1995Chain Ownership, Organizational Size, and Editorial Role Perceptions

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.