SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian latent class models (STARD‐BLCM)
4 references·0 citing·17 second hop
Reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian latent class models (STARD‐BLCM) (2017)Reporting guidelines for diagnostic accur…STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models (2017)STARD-BLCM: Standards for the…STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: An Updated List o…Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review (2013)Latent Class Models in Diagno…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Exploratory Latent Structure Analysis Using Both Identifiable and Unidentifiable Models (1974)Latent Class Analysis (1987)Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods (2007)What Is the Optimal Cut-Off Point of the 10-Item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Screening Depression Among Chinese Individuals Aged 45 and Over? An Exploration Using Latent Profile Analysis (2022)Design, statistical analysis and reporting standards for test accuracy studies for infectious diseases in animals: Progress, challenges and recommendations (2018)Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies (2019)Invited review: Completeness of reporting of experiments: REFLECTing on a year of animal trials in the Journal of Dairy Science (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies1,346 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2017STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models219 cited
  • 2013Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review217 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work