SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Venire jurors’ perceptions of adversarial allegiance. · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleVenire jurors’ perceptions of adversarial allegiance.

Nicholas Scurich2015

Article2015

Venire jurors’ perceptions of adversarial allegiance.

Nicholas Scurich · Daniel A. Krauss · Lauren Reiser · Robert J. Garcia · LillyBelle Ku'ulei Deer

9 citations·0/0 files stored·Psychology Public Policy and Law

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Legal processes and jurisprudence Social and Intergroup Psychology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power 1994Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy.1971Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process 2011Psychopathic Personality 2013Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?2011Current Directions in Violence Risk Assessment 2009Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?1996Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist—Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: A case law survey.article · 7 shared references 2009Aggravation and Mitigation: Findings and Implicationsarticle · 7 shared references 2014Jurors' Views on the Value and Objectivity of Mental Health Experts Testifying in Sexually Violent Predator Trialsarticle · 7 shared references 2015Cross-examination educates jurors about missing control groups in scientific evidence.article · 7 shared references 2013Investigating the role of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in United States case law.article · 6 shared references 2019Variations in reliability and validity do not influence judge, attorney, and mock juror decisions about psychological expert evidence.article · 6 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-05-01

VenuePsychology Public Policy and Law

ISSN-L1076-8971

Languageen

Citations9

Files0 public / 0

ShelfJury Decision Making Processes

Identifiers

doi10.1037/law0000042

openalex_workW2731935867

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.