Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Lessons From the Past, Institutions for the Future

Gian-Claudia Sciara

66 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the American Planning Association

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Transportation Planning and Optimization Local Governance and Planning Urban Planning and Governance

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: There are more than 400 U.S. metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) overseeing multiple transportation projects totaling billions of dollars, yet these crucial organizations and their history and current role are generally unknown or confusing to many planning practitioners and scholars. MPOs face major challenges in developing meaningful long-range regional transportation plans, challenges rooted in their history that planners should understand as they grapple with metropolitan planning efforts. MPOs may approve projects and their funding, but disparate agencies and often competitive local governments control budgets and actually build projects. MPOs, moreover, do not fully represent all regional interests and have no control over the local land use decisions that would support less autocentric communities and human-powered modes. I provide a metareview of the history of regional transportation planning and the MPOs responsible for it, describing U.S. metropolitan transportation planning from the early 20th century. Federal legislation in the 1960s first suggested a regional forum for conversations about metropolitan transportation. Federal legislation in subsequent decades made incremental if incomplete progress toward creating a meaningful regional forum, adapting institutions and practices to increase stakeholder involvement as well as the scope of transport planning, yet MPOs have multiple limitations that planners can address.Takeaway for practice: History suggests that MPOs can be a force for regional change. Planners and policymakers could anchor future reforms to MPOs’ existing legal and administrative frameworks. Planners should revisit the membership and voting structures of MPO boards to ensure better stakeholder representation and permit some MPOs to generate and direct transportation funds at the local level.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

2010Travel and the Built Environment 1989Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century 1997The City: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century 2004Mega-projects: the changing politics of urban public investment 2016Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?2012A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States 2002The New Regionalism:Key Characteristics of an Emerging Movement 2013Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks

Cited by

2020Toward Mobility Justice 2020Comparing the impacts of local land use and urban spatial structure on household VMT and GHG emissions 2018Crowdsourcing Bike Share Station Locations 2020What Determines Where Public Investment Goes? Regional Governance and the Role of Institutional Rules and Power 2021Effect of Cross-Departmental Collaboration on Performance: Evidence from the Federal Highway Administration

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.