SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Promoting transparency and reproducibility in Behavioral Neuroscience: Publishing replications, registered reports, and null results.
5 references·4 citing·34 second hop
Promoting transparency and reproducibility in Behavioral Neuroscience: Publishing replications, registered reports, and null results. (2017)Promoting transparency and reproducibilit…Registered reports at the European Journal of Neuroscience: consolidating and extending peer‐reviewed study pre‐registration (2016)Registered reports at the Eur…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex (2012)Registered Reports: A new pub…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …A standardized framework to test event-based experiments (2024)A standardized framework to t…Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility (2022)Quality Output Checklist and …A qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences with Registered Reports Funding Partnerships (2021)A qualitative analysis of sta…O viés de publicação: por que publicar resultados negativos? (2020)O viés de publicação: por que…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019)Single Item Measures in Psychological Science (2022)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017)Sample Size Justification (2022)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Social Theory and Social Structure. (1969)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)Scientific Utopia (2012)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication (2017)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide (2013)Thematic Analysis (2019)Evaluating Registered Reports Funding Partnerships: a feasibility study (2021)Demystifying Open Science in health psychology and behavioral medicine: a practical guide to Registered Reports and Data Notes (2024)International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review (2025)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Open Research: Examples of good practice, and resources across disciplines (2025 edition) (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Identifying spin bias of nonsignificant findings in biomedical studies (2023)Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite Journal awareness and updated Information for Authors (2023)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The Contact Hypothesis Revisited (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,995 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,393 cited
  • 2012Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex574 cited
  • 2016Registered reports at the European Journal of Neuroscience: consolidating and extending peer‐reviewed study pre‐registration24 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility18 cited
  • 2021A qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences with Registered Reports Funding Partnerships14 cited
  • 2024A standardized framework to test event-based experiments9 cited
  • 2020O viés de publicação: por que publicar resultados negativos?8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work