SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Existing reporting guidelines for clinical trials are not completely relevant for implantable medical devices: a systematic review
16 references·1 citing·31 second hopsampled
Existing reporting guidelines for clinical trials are not completely relevant for implantable medical devices: a systematic review (2017)Existing reporting guidelines for clinica…CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2015)CONSORT extension for reporti…Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Better reporting of intervent…The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (2013)The CARE Guidelines: Consensu…The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensu…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)Reporting of Patient-Reported…CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions (2011)CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving an…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation (2009)Challenges in evaluating surg…Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Extending the CONSORT Stateme…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus (2005)A checklist to evaluate a rep…Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Randomised trials in surgery:…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions (1996)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic cardiovascular medical devices (2018)Quality of reporting in rando…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy (2010)Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Explanation and Elaboration Statement (2016)Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,382 cited
  • 2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,563 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,882 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies6,614 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,861 cited
  • 2011CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions1,858 cited
  • 2013The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development1,449 cited
  • 2013Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,393 cited
  • 2013The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development1,342 cited
  • 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
  • 2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation654 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1996Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions436 cited
  • 2005A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus311 cited
  • 2015CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement251 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of therapeutic cardiovascular medical devices6 cited