Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Planning Theory for the naive?

10 references·12 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986The Past is a Foreign Country3,632 cited
2006Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies2,479 cited
1992Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory1,100 cited
2003Collaborative Planning in Perspective990 cited
1996The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation593 cited
2003Readings in Planning Theory362 cited
2003Why Do Planning Theory?77 cited
2004Towards a Reconstruction of the Public Interest Criterion62 cited
2002Globalization, Ethical Compromise and Planning Theory47 cited
1998The Globalisation of Poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank Reforms46 cited

Cited by

2012Spatial Planning, Complexity and a World 'Out of Equilibrium' - Outline of a Non-linear Approach to Planning28 cited
2013Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning28 cited
2021The ‘Collaborative Planning Turn’ in China: Exploring three decades of diffusion, interpretation and reception in Chinese planning22 cited
2015Public welfare or sectarianism: A new challenge for planning22 cited
2011Democracy or efficiency: contradictory national guidelines in urban planning in Norway

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

21 cited

2016Local self-determination, process-focus and subordination of environmental concerns19 cited

2018Whose interest finally counts? The statutory production of urban space at the fringes of Dhaka, Bangladesh19 cited

2010Schools of Planning Thought: Exploring Differences through Similarities17 cited

2017Rationality and Power in Land Use Planning16 cited

2023Urban sustainability responsibilities of the European planning profession in the next decades15 cited

2023Institutional Gaps in Agonistic and Communicative Planning Theories. Critical Implications of the ‘Systemic Turn’ in Deliberative Democracy Theory14 cited

2005Communicative Planners as Naїve Mandarins of the Neo-liberal State?5 cited