Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review dataCarole J. Lee, David Moher2017-07-20articleScience72 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Academic integrity and plagiarismPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open AccessAbstractPublishers must invest, and manage riskCitations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 72 citations exist upstream.References2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era2015The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)2015Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index2014The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysisCited by2018Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015)2020Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model2017Scientometrics of peer review2017How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals2019A scoping review of simulation models of peer review2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review2022Towards theorizing peer review