Lonely sensational icons: semantic neighbourhood density, sensory experience and iconicity

David M. Sidhu · Penny M. Pexman

60 citations0/0 files storedLanguage Cognition and Neuroscience

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Categorization, perception, and language Reading and Literacy Development Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Abstract

Perry, Perlman, and Lupyan (2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS One, 10, e0137147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137147) found that a sample of English words was rated as being slightly iconic, on average, with words varying in their iconicity. Thus, the relationship between word form and meaning does not seem to be categorically arbitrary. We investigated factors that might explain variation in iconicity: specifically, that concepts with sparser semantic neighbourhoods have more iconic word forms, and that concepts with more sensory information are more likely to have iconic word forms (as in Winter, Perlman, Perry, & Lupyan, in press. Which words are the most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words. Interaction Studies. Retrieved from http://sapir.psych.wisc.edu/papers/winter_perlman_perry_lupyan_interaction-studies.pdf), even after accounting for age of acquisition (AoA; Kuperman, Stadthagen-Gonzalez, & Brysbaert, 2012. Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4). We found support for both predictions: words with sparser semantic neighbourhoods (ARC; Shaoul & Westbury, 2010. Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 393–413. doi:10.3758/Brm.42.2.393), and greater associated sensory experience (SER; Juhasz & Yap, 2013. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono-and disyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 160–168. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0242-9), were more iconic, even after accounting for AoA. ARC was also found to moderate SER. These results further our appreciation of iconicity as a general property of the lexicon.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English 2012Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words 2015Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language 2008Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity 2016Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages 2012Advances in the Cross‐Linguistic Study of Ideophones 1997Language from the body iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language 2014The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution

Cited by

2019Sensory Linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor 2020Iconicity ratings for 10,995 Spanish words and their relationship with psycholinguistic variables 2021An investigation of iconic language development in four datasets

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.