A Comparison of the International Charters on Geographical Education

Terri Bourke · Rod Lane

5 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Geography

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Geography Education and Pedagogy Historical Geography and Geographical Thought Geography and Education Methods

Abstract

This article uses discourse analysis techniques associated with Foucauldian archaeology to examine the two international charters developed by the International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education (IGU-CGE), the original one in 1992 and the revised version endorsed in 2016 at the Beijing conference. The examination considers the consultation and development processes before outlining similarities and differences in the messages communicated and how discourses have changed through time. The article concludes with recommendations for the geography education community for the future.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

References

1978Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.1996Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.1970Archaeology of Knowledge 2003Teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity 2003The Activist Teaching Profession 1991Foucault and education: disciplines and knowledge 2007Education policies for raising student learning: the Finnish approach 2003Teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity

Cited by

2022Geography and International Education

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.