Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Methodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder

16 references·2 citing·21 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,677 cited

2014Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines657 cited

2014Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties161 cited

2015Innovations in Data Collection, Management, and Archiving for Systematic Reviews117 cited

Cited by

2021Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery17 cited
2020Risk of Bias and Quality of Reporting in Colon and Rectal Cancer Systematic Reviews Cited by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines11 cited