SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
5 references·5 citing·42 second hop
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases (2017)Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systemat…Innovations in Data Collection, Management, and Archiving for Systematic Reviews (2015)Innovations in Data Collectio…Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability (2014)Outcomes in Cochrane Systemat…Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review (2014)Choosing Important Health Out…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …A Web-based archive of systematic review data (2012)A Web-based archive of system…Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2022)Introduction to Systematic Re…Selecting Review Outcomes for Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions (2021)Selecting Review Outcomes for…Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study (2020)Outcome choice and definition…Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a perspective introducing Cochrane Corner in Eye (2019)Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a p…Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting (2018)Caveat emptor: the combined e…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy (2017)Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions (2017)Summarising good practice guidelines for data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth (2015)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)An international registry of systematic-review protocols (2010)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration (2013)PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2014)Automating Risk of Bias Assessment for Clinical Trials (2015)MetaBUS as a vehicle for facilitating meta-analysis (2016)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study) (2017)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Investigation of Risk Of Bias due to Unreported and SelecTively included results in meta-analyses of nutrition research: the ROBUST study protocol (2020)Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2023)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 3: Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms (2021)Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2014Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review338 cited
  • 2014Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability120 cited
  • 2015Innovations in Data Collection, Management, and Archiving for Systematic Reviews117 cited
  • 2012A Web-based archive of systematic review data66 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Outcome choice and definition in systematic reviews leads to few eligible studies included in meta-analyses: a case study34 cited
  • 2018Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting21 cited
  • 2022Introduction to Systematic Reviews10 cited
  • 2021Selecting Review Outcomes for Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions9 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a perspective introducing Cochrane Corner in Eye9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work