SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews
16 references·3 citing·40 second hop
Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews (2017)Information sources for obesity preventio…Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies (2016)Searching and synthesising ‘g…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity‐related outcomes: a systematic review of naturally occurring experiments (2015)Impact of policy and built en…Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Applying systematic review se…Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence (2014)Healthy food subsidies and un…A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: Understanding the recent evidence (2014)A systematic review of the ef…The effectiveness of policies for reducing dietary trans fat: a systematic review of the evidence (2013)The effectiveness of policies…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Google Scholar as replacement…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Reprint—Preferred Reporting I…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: A systematic review (2008)Economic analyses of transpor…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar (2007)Comparing test searches in Pu…Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence? (2022)Efficient searching for NICE …The wiki toolkit for planning, conducting and reporting mixed studies reviews (2018)The wiki toolkit for planning…Crowdsourcing a mixed systematic review on a complex topic and a heterogeneous population: Lessons learned (2018)Crowdsourcing a mixed systema…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)The Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Its Implications for the Global Food Supply Chains (2022)The Impact of Food Prices on Consumption: A Systematic Review of Research on the Price Elasticity of Demand for Food (2009)The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Regressive Sin Taxes, with an Application to the Optimal Soda Tax* (2019)Towards food supply chain resilience to environmental shocks (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review (2015)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities (2018)Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness (2018)Extreme events and gender-based violence: a mixed-methods systematic review (2022)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2,485 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2015Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada958 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
  • 2016Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies486 cited
  • 2014A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: Understanding the recent evidence385 cited
  • 2015Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity‐related outcomes: a systematic review of naturally occurring experiments288 cited
  • 2014Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence279 cited
  • 2007Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

231 cited
  • 2013Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough224 cited
  • 2013The effectiveness of policies for reducing dietary trans fat: a systematic review of the evidence221 cited
  • 2008Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: A systematic review192 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence?13 cited
    • 2018Crowdsourcing a mixed systematic review on a complex topic and a heterogeneous population: Lessons learned12 cited
    • 2018The wiki toolkit for planning, conducting and reporting mixed studies reviews10 cited