Health-Related Disaster Communication and Social Media: Mixed-Method Systematic Review

Stine Eckert, Pradeep Sopory, Ashleigh M. Day, Lee Wilkins, Donyale R. Griffin Padgett, Julie M. Novak, Jane Noyes, Tomas Allen +3 more

2017-08-21reviewHealth Communication75 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Public Relations and Crisis Communication Disaster Response and Management Social Media in Health Education

Abstract

This mixed-method evidence synthesis drew on Cochrane methods and principles to systematically review literature published between 2003 and 2016 on the best social media practices to promote health protection and dispel misinformation during disasters. Seventy-nine studies employing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods on risk communication during disasters in all UN-languages were reviewed, finding that agencies need to contextualize the use of social media for particular populations and crises. Social media are tools that still have not become routine practices in many governmental agencies regarding public health in the countries studied. Social media, especially Twitter and Facebook (and equivalents in countries such as China), need to be incorporated into daily operations of governmental agencies and implementing partners to build familiarity with them before health-related crises happen. This was especially observed in U.S. agencies, local government, and first responders but also for city governments and school administrations in Europe. For those that do use social media during health-related risk communication, studies find that public relations officers, governmental agencies, and the general public have used social media successfully to spread truthful information and to verify information to dispel rumors during disasters. Few studies focused on the recovery and preparation phases and on countries in the Southern hemisphere, except for Australia. The vast majority of studies did not analyze the demographics of social media users beyond their geographic location, their status of being inside/outside the disaster zone; and their frequency and content of posting. Socioeconomic demographics were not collected and/or analyzed to drill deeper into the implications of using social media to reach vulnerable populations. Who exactly is reached via social media campaigns and who needs to be reached with other means has remained an understudied area.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 75 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

2000Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data

2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

2009Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review

2015Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)

2011A Work‐In‐Process Literature Review: Incorporating Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication

2016Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity

2015Socializing in emergencies—A review of the use of social media in emergency situations

Cited by

2018Communicating about infectious disease threats: Insights from public health information officers

2021A process view of crisis misinformation: How public relations professionals detect, manage, and evaluate crisis misinformation