SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviewer interest in a manuscript may predict its future citation potential
7 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Reviewer interest in a manuscript may predict its future citation potential (2017)Reviewer interest in a manuscript may pre…Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses (2016)Why do peer reviewers decline…The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers in Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters (2016)The correlation between edito…Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: the journals Nature, Science and Cell (2015)Editorial delay and its relat…Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting (2007)Editorial and publication del…Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey (2006)Why do peer reviewers decline…Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals (2006)Predictors of publication: ch…The Role of the Priority Rule in Science (2003)The Role of the Priority Rule…Dataset and analysis of editorial board composition of 165 Hindawi journals indexed and abstracted in PubMed based on affiliations (2018)Dataset and analysis of edito…Contributing factors to long‐term citation count in marine and freshwater biology articles (2017)Contributing factors to long‐…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Scientific peer review (2011)Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric.com (2020)Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)Effects of open access and articles-in-press mechanisms on publishing lag and first-citation speed: a case on energy and fuels journals (2021)Peer Review (1994)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective (2017)Gender bias in scholarly peer review (2017)Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Reputation and impact in academic careers (2014)Clustering citation histories in the Physical Review (2016)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Referencing as Persuasion (1977)Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas† (2006)Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Editorial Board Membership of Management and Business Journals: A Social Network Analysis Study of the Financial Times 40 (2010)Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals (2016)The Communication Structure of Epistemic Communities (2007)Epistemic Landscapes and the Division of Cognitive Labor (2009)The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity (2009)Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment (2018)Innovative Strategies for Peer Review (2020)Gender differences among active reviewers: an investigation based on publons (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003The Role of the Priority Rule in Science346 cited
  • 2006Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey195 cited
  • 2006Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals130 cited
  • 2007Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting71 cited
  • 2016Why do peer reviewers decline to review manuscripts? A study of reviewer invitation responses63 cited
  • 2015Editorial delay and its relation to subsequent citations: the journals Nature, Science and Cell29 cited
  • 2016The correlation between editorial delay and the ratio of highly cited papers in Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters26 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Dataset and analysis of editorial board composition of 165 Hindawi journals indexed and abstracted in PubMed based on affiliations8 cited
  • 2017Contributing factors to long‐term citation count in marine and freshwater biology articles5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work