Estimates of Between-Study Heterogeneity for 705 Meta-Analyses Reported in Psychological Bulletin From 1990–2013

Sara van Erp · Josine Verhagen · Raoul P. P. P. Grasman · Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers

116 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Open Psychology Data

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

We present a data set containing 705 between-study heterogeneity estimates τ2 as reported in 61 articles published in Psychological Bulletin from 1990–2013. The data set also includes information about the number and type of effect sizes, the Q- and I2-statistics, and publication bias. The data set is stored in the Open Science Framework repository (https://osf.io/wyhve/) and can be used for several purposes: (1) to compare a specific heterogeneity estimate to the distribution of between-study heterogeneity estimates in psychology; (2) to construct an informed prior distribution for the between-study heterogeneity in psychology; (3) to obtain realistic population values for Monte Carlo simulations investigating the performance of meta-analytic methods. Funding statement: This research was supported by the ERC project “Bayes or Bust”.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 116 citations exist upstream.

References

1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis 1993The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis.2005Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model 2012Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008Fixed‐ versus random‐effects models in meta‐analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results 2014Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data 2011An informed reference prior for between‐study heterogeneity in meta‐analyses of binary outcomes

Cited by

2018Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences 2021A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect 2021On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random‐effects meta‐analysis 2020Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.