SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Presentation approaches for enhancing interpretability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in meta-analysis: a protocol for a systematic survey of Cochrane reviews (2017)Presentation approaches for enhancing int…Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol (2015)Minimally important differenc…Methods to convert continuous outcomes into odds ratios of treatment response and numbers needed to treat: meta-epidemiological study (2012)Methods to convert continuous…GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes (2012)GRADE guidelines: 13. Prepari…Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review (2012)Credibility of claims of subg…Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods (2011)Ratio of means for analyzing …Pooling health‐related quality of life outcomes in meta‐analysis—a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability (2011)Pooling health‐related qualit…Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units (2010)Improving the interpretation …The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: A simulation study (2008)The ratio of means method as …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)Interpretation of Changes in …From effect size into number needed to treat (1999)From effect size into number …Effect-Size Estimates: Issues and Problems in Interpretation (1996)Effect-Size Estimates: Issues…Meta-analytic Tools for Medical Decision Making: A Practical Guide (1995)Meta-analytic Tools for Medic…Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. (1995)Meta-analysis of screening an…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Statistical Methods for Meta-…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)Measurement of health status (1989)Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life (1993)Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D (2005)Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes (2007)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The excess costs of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use (2021)When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)The effects of executives’ experiences and perceptions on their assessment of potential technological alliances (1998)The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? (2004)Designing Experiments That Generalize (2007)Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2013)Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness (1967)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients (2015)A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change (1979)Optimal Strategies for Reporting Pain in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop (2015)GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence (2017)Interventions to Promote Fundamental Movement Skills in Childcare and Kindergarten: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis of Recidivism Studies. (2005)Childhood Maltreatment Predicts Unfavorable Course of Illness and Treatment Outcome in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2011)WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (2010)Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration (2015)Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease (2015)The lack of statistical power of subgroup analyses in meta-analyses: a cautionary note (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1988Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis10,330 cited
  • 2003Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life4,692 cited
  • 2012GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes771 cited
  • 1995Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests.577 cited
  • 2012Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review395 cited
  • 2008The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: A simulation study329 cited
  • 1996Effect-Size Estimates: Issues and Problems in Interpretation304 cited
  • 2011Pooling health‐related quality of life outcomes in meta‐analysis—a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability295 cited
  • 2011Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods229 cited
  • 2010Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units161 cited
  • 2015Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol148 cited
  • 2012Methods to convert continuous outcomes into odds ratios of treatment response and numbers needed to treat: meta-epidemiological study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

145 cited
  • 1995Meta-analytic Tools for Medical Decision Making: A Practical Guide123 cited
  • 1999From effect size into number needed to treat114 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.