SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Registry-based randomized controlled trials merged the strength of randomized controlled trails and observational studies and give rise to more pragmatic trials
4 references·1 citing·21 second hop
Registry-based randomized controlled trials merged the strength of randomized controlled trails and observational studies and give rise to more pragmatic trials (2017)Registry-based randomized controlled tria…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Evidence summaries: the evolu…Probabilistic record linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a patient identification number (2007)Probabilistic record linkage …Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Randomised trials in surgery:…Two decades of surgical randomized controlled trials: worldwide trends in volume and methodological quality (2023)Two decades of surgical rando…A Theory for Record Linkage (1969)Advances in Record-Linkage Methodology as Applied to Matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida (1989)Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files (1995)Linking clinical registry data with administrative data using indirect identifiers: Implementation and validation in the congenital heart surgery population (2010)Results from simulated data sets: probabilistic record linkage outperforms deterministic record linkage (2010)Approach to record linkage of primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink to other health-related patient data: overview and implications (2018)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)METHODOLOGICAL INDEX FOR NON-RANDOMIZED STUDIES ( MINORS ): DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW INSTRUMENT (2003)A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus (2005)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2012Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach1,232 cited
  • 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
  • 2007Probabilistic record linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a patient identification number255 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Two decades of surgical randomized controlled trials: worldwide trends in volume and methodological quality20 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work