Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A simple technique investigating baseline heterogeneity helped to eliminate potential bias in meta-analyses

9 references·2 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample9,051 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials473 cited
2017Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals229 cited
2013Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review171 cited
2007The impact of trial baseline imbalances should be considered in systematic reviews: a methodological case study59 cited
2014A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups36 cited

Cited by

2024Selection Bias Risk in Randomized Controlled Trials Rated as Low Bias Using Risk of Bias, Version 2 (RoB2) Tool12 cited
2024A Test Method for Identifying Selection Bias Risk in Prospective Controlled Clinical Therapy Trials Using the I2 Point Estimate11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work