SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cochrane and the COMET initiative: developing the evidence base in oral medicine
4 references·0 citing·21 second hop
Cochrane and the COMET initiative: developing the evidence base in oral medicine (2017)Cochrane and the COMET initiative: develo…How do we create, and improve, the evidence base? (2016)How do we create, and improve…Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health (2016)Challenges, solutions and fut…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1991)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector (2017)Standard comparison of local mental health care systems in eight European countries (2017)Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges (2020)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)There is room for improvement in the use of scoping reviews in dentistry (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2016Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health187 cited
  • 2016How do we create, and improve, the evidence base?21 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work