SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting systematic reviews: Some lessons from a tertiary study · Study

ReviewReporting systematic reviews: Some lessons from a tertiary study

David Budgen2017

OA

Reviewgreen2017

Reporting systematic reviews: Some lessons from a tertiary study

David Budgen · Pearl Brereton A · Sarah Drummond · Nikki Williams

99 citations·0/0 files stored·Information and Software Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Academic Writing and Publishing Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 99 citations exist upstream.

References

2013A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering 2009Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review 2011Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine, 2nd edition 2010Barriers in the selection of offshore software development outsourcing vendors: An exploratory study using a systematic literature review 2022Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine

Cited by

2019Supply chain sustainability: A tertiary literature review 2022Barriers, Drivers, and Social Considerations for AI Adoption in Supply Chain Management: A Tertiary Study 2023Evidence-based decision-making: On the use of systematicity cases to check the compliance of reviews with reporting guidelines such as PRISMA 2020 2019Search. Review. Repeat? An empirical study of threats to replicating SLR searches 2024Drone Technologies: A Tertiary Systematic Literature Review on a Decade of Improvements 2023Bolstering the Persistence of Black Students in Undergraduate Computer Science Programs: A Systematic Mapping Study 2019A critical appraisal tool for systematic literature reviews in software engineering

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020On Using Grey Literature and Google Scholar in Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineeringreview · 2 shared references 2016Health Outcomes of a Series of Bonny Method of Guided Imagery and Music Sessions: A Systematic Reviewreview · 2 shared references 2014Panning for the gold in health research: Incorporating studies’ methodological quality in meta-analysisarticle · 2 shared references 2014Discrepancies between registration and publication of randomised controlled trials: an observational studyarticle · 2 shared references 2012Systematic reviews to evaluate causation: an overview of methods and applicationreview · 2 shared references 2015Information Technology Artifacts in the Regulatory Compliance of Business Processes: A Meta-Analysisother · 2 shared references

Details

Year2017

Typereview

Published2017-10-27

VenueInformation and Software Technology

ISSN-L0950-5849

Languageen

Citations99

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.infsof.2017.10.017

openalex_workW2765565489

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022Evidence-Based Software Engineering: A Checklist-Based Approach to Assess the Abstracts of Reviews Self-Identifying as Systematic Reviews