SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Transparent review at the European Journal of Neuroscience: experiences one year on
1 references·1 citing·8 second hop
Transparent review at the European Journal of Neuroscience: experiences one year on (2017)Transparent review at the European Journa…Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication (2017)Open review and the quest for…The cautious faculty: Malaysian university researchers’ awareness, experiences, and attitudes towards Open Peer Review (2021)The cautious faculty: Malaysi…Registered reports at the European Journal of Neuroscience: consolidating and extending peer‐reviewed study pre‐registration (2016)Research integrity: Don't let transparency damage science (2016)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)Ensuring effective scholarly communication: traditions and innovations of peer review (2021)Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review (2025)Determining Sample Size for Research Activities (1970)A theory of organizational readiness for change (2009)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication12 cited

Cited by

  • 2021The cautious faculty: Malaysian university researchers’ awareness, experiences, and attitudes towards Open Peer Review5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work