SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles (2017)Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Ap…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness (2015)Fixed or random effects meta-…PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporti…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A basic introduction to fixed…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Evaluating non-randomised int…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews (1996)Completeness of reporting of …Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analyses of Randomized C…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement (2012)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis (2013)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,786 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies2,905 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
  • 2015Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness1,056 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

857 cited
  • 2013PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts706 cited
  • 1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.