SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Searching for trial protocols: A comparison of methods
16 references·1 citing·48 second hopsampled
Searching for trial protocols: A comparison of methods (2017)Searching for trial protocols: A comparis…Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013 (2015)Trends in global clinical tri…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols (2013)SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Methodological developments i…The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials (2011)The Quality of Registration o…Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy (2011)Completeness and Changes in R…Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Comparison of protocols and r…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence (2009)Avoidable Waste in the Produc…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet (2008)Selective reporting in clinic…Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols (2008)Discrepancies in sample size …Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Outcome reporting bias in ran…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…State of the art, state of the science? (2018)State of the art, state of th…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review (2015)Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for young people with suicide-related behaviour (Reframe-IT): a randomised controlled trial (2017)Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain (2016)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) – an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis (2012)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (2008)Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2009Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence600 cited
  • 2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols306 cited
  • 2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
  • 2015Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013227 cited
  • 2008Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols201 cited
  • 2011The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials150 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008Selective reporting in clinical trials: analysis of trial protocols accepted by The Lancet120 cited
  • 2011Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy115 cited
  • 2013Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?112 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018State of the art, state of the science?5 cited