SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Journal Impact Factor (JIF): Science Publishing’s Miscalculating Metric
0 references·9 citing·31 second hop
The Journal Impact Factor (JIF): Science Publishing’s Miscalculating Metric (2017)The Journal Impact Factor (JIF): Science …Making the impact of publications within a field comparable by improving the field-weighted citation impact (FWCI): the case of sport management (2025)Making the impact of publicat…Synthesis of Publication Metrics in Kinesiology-Related Journals: Proxies for Rigor, Usage, and Prestige (2023)Synthesis of Publication Metr…Feasibility of activity-based expert profiling using text mining of scientific publications and patents (2020)Feasibility of activity-based…Exploring the relationship between journal indexing and article processing charges of journals published by MDPI, the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (2020)Exploring the relationship be…CiteScore: risk of copy-cat, fake and misleading metrics (2020)CiteScore: risk of copy-cat, …Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure (2019)Open Access Mega-Journals: Qu…The Google Scholar h-index: useful but burdensome metric (2018)The Google Scholar h-index: u…Rejoinder to “Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes” (2018)Rejoinder to “Multiple versio…Preprints: ethical hazard or academic liberation? (2017)Preprints: ethical hazard or …The Ingelfinger Rule (1981)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Preprints for the life sciences (2016)Africa’s challenges in the OA movement: risks and possibilities (2019)Methodological considerations for identifying questionable publishing in a national context: The case of Swedish Higher Education Institutions (2020)Spanish personal name variations in national and international biomedical databases: implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies. (2002)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Accuracy evaluation of Scopus Author ID based on the largest funding database in Japan (2015)Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Self-Citation Analysis on Google Scholar Dataset for H-Index Corrections (2019)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors (2016)Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions (2018)On the Nature of Quality in the Contexts of Academic Publication and Sustainability (2021)Should ORCID Be Mandatory for Authors, but Not for Editors? (2022)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)The power of altmetrics on a CV (2013)Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment (2019)Using Scopus’s CiteScore for assessing the quality of computer science conferences (2019)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric? (2017)Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Strategies for Enhancing Sharing Economy Practices Across Diverse Industries: A Systematic Review (2024)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017Preprints: ethical hazard or academic liberation?14 cited
  • 2018The Google Scholar h-index: useful but burdensome metric13 cited
  • 2019Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure12 cited
  • 2018Rejoinder to “Multiple versions of the h-index: cautionary use for formal academic purposes”12 cited
  • 2025Making the impact of publications within a field comparable by improving the field-weighted citation impact (FWCI): the case of sport management11 cited
  • 2023Synthesis of Publication Metrics in Kinesiology-Related Journals: Proxies for Rigor, Usage, and Prestige10 cited
  • 2020Exploring the relationship between journal indexing and article processing charges of journals published by MDPI, the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute7 cited
  • 2020CiteScore: risk of copy-cat, fake and misleading metrics7 cited
  • 2020Feasibility of activity-based expert profiling using text mining of scientific publications and patents7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work