Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Continuity and change in the institution of town and country planning: Modelling the role of ideology

16 references·6 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2008Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse3,412 cited
1956IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts2,278 cited
2010Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’1,599 cited
1997Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach1,038 cited
2002Political Analysis806 cited
2013The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies704 cited
2003Ideology489 cited
1998Ideologies and Political Theory470 cited
1998The third way: New politics for the new century466 cited
2006Town and Country Planning in the UK422 cited
2008European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning339 cited
2012Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research333 cited
1992Ideology: An Introduction302 cited
2009Constructivist Institutionalism281 cited
1987British town and country planning153 cited
2012Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration120 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

2017Is Urban Planning in Australia Hindered by Poor Metropolitan Governance?16 cited
2018Liberty, property and the state: The ideology of the institution of English town and country planning15 cited
2023Institutional Gaps in Agonistic and Communicative Planning Theories. Critical Implications of the ‘Systemic Turn’ in Deliberative Democracy Theory14 cited
2020Profiling ‘Red Bologna’: Between neoliberalisation tendencies and municipal socialist legacy12 cited
2024Capturing planning: Politics of land based accumulation in Tehran6 cited
2018Strengthening Planning’s Effectiveness in a Hyper-Polarized World/Responding to the Conservative Common Sense of Opposition to Planning and Development in England/The Limits to Negotiation and the Promise of Refusal/Planning Contexts in a Hyper-Polarized World/A Right to Sanctuary: Supporting Immigrant Communities in an Era of Extreme Precarity/Planning and Climate Change: Opportunities and Challenges in a Politically Contested Environment/Speaking with the Middle 40% to Bridge the Political Divide for Mutual Gains in Planning Agreements5 cited