SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation
16 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation (2017)Association between statistical significa…Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study (2017)Unpublished systematic review…PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (2017)PROSPERO International prospe…Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study (2017)Majority of systematic review…Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described (2016)Methods for detecting, quanti…The importance of PROSPERO to the National Institute for Health Research (2012)The importance of PROSPERO to…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study (2009)Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane rev…An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist (2009)An international survey indic…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Association Between Time Interval to Publication and Statistical Significance (2002)Association Between Time Inte…Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials (1998)Effect of the Statistical Sig…Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Publication bias: evidence of…How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. (1997)How important is publication …Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Factors Influencing Publicati…Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias: the case fo…Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study (2019)Statistical significance did …The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)The Short-term Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers to the Poor: Experimental Evidence from Kenya* (2016)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement (1996)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review (2014)Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. (1975)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Comparison of statistical inferences from the DerSimonian–Laird and alternative random‐effects model meta‐analyses – an empirical assessment of 920 Cochrane primary outcome meta‐analyses (2011)A Systematic Review of Social Media Use to Discuss and View Deliberate Self-Harm Acts (2016)Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis (2015)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders (1997)The Delphi List (1998)Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (2001)Home practice in Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of participants' mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes (2017)The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review (2021)Understanding Eco-anxiety: A Systematic Scoping Review of Current Literature and Identified Knowledge Gaps (2021)A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996–2005 (2005)Review: Immigrants and Health Care Access, Quality, and Cost (2009)About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: A systematic review of inclusive leadership research (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
  • 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
  • 1986Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.746 cited
  • 1998Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials631 cited
  • 1997How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.311 cited
  • 2017PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews185 cited
  • 2009Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study93 cited
  • 2012The importance of PROSPERO to the National Institute for Health Research82 cited
  • 2017Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study69 cited
  • 2009An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist64 cited
  • 2002

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Association Between Time Interval to Publication and Statistical Significance
51 cited
  • 2016Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described48 cited
  • 2017Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study18 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study8 cited