SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Outputs and Growth of Primary Care Databases in the United Kingdom: Bibliometric Analysis
2 references·1 citing·14 second hop
Outputs and Growth of Primary Care Databases in the United Kingdom: Bibliometric Analysis (2017)Outputs and Growth of Primary Care Databa…Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Two new Later Stone Age sites…Academic Impact of a Public Electronic Health Database: Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Using the General Practice Research Database (2011)Academic Impact of a Public E…A systematic investigation on the research publications that have used the medical expenditure panel survey (MEPS) data through a bibliometrics approach (2020)A systematic investigation on…Power Laws in the Information Production Process: Lotkaian Informetrics (2005)The state of h index research (2008)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research (2016)Two Decades of Research Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Claims Data: Bibliometric and Text Mining Analysis on PubMed (2020)Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics (1969)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology (1989)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2024Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal24,064 cited
  • 2011Academic Impact of a Public Electronic Health Database: Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Using the General Practice Research Database65 cited

Cited by

  • 2020A systematic investigation on the research publications that have used the medical expenditure panel survey (MEPS) data through a bibliometrics approach14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work