SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Heuristic Bias and Conflict Detection During Thinking · Study

ChapterShelves

ChapterHeuristic Bias and Conflict Detection During Thinking

Wim De Neys2015

Chapter2015

Heuristic Bias and Conflict Detection During Thinking

21 citations·0/0 files stored·The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Thinking, Fast and Slow 1999Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.1973On the psychology of prediction.1999Dual-process theories in social psychology 2007Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition 1986Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data 2000Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?2013Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

Cited by

2017Inductive reasoning 2.0 2021The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity 2022Who detects and why: how do individual differences in cognitive characteristics underpin different types of responses to reasoning tasks?2018Effects of Thinking Dispositions, General Ability, Numeracy, and Instructional Set on Judgments and Decision-Making 2019Who detects and why: How individual differences in cognitive characteristics underpin different types of responses on reasoning tasks?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2014Bias detection: Response confidence evidence for conflict sensitivity in the ratio bias taskarticle · 24 shared references 2022A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondchapter · 23 shared references 2009Heuristic Bias, Conflict, and Rationality in Decision-Makingchapter · 23 shared references 2022A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondpreprint · 22 shared references 2018To detect or not to detect: A replication and extension of the three-stage modelarticle · 22 shared references 2013The ‘whys’ and ‘whens’ of individual differences in thinking biasesreview · 20 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typechapter

Published2015-01-01

VenueThe Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation

ISSN-L0079-7421

Languageen

Citations21

Files0 public / 0

ShelfDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Identifiers

doi10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.001

openalex_workW27672982

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2023Robust intuition? Exploring the difference in the strength of intuitions from perspective of attentional bias

2020The Bright Homunculus in our Head: Individual Differences in Intuitive Sensitivity to Logical Validity

2022The Cognitive Unconscious and Dual Process Theories of Reasoning