SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
It’s the workflows, stupid! What is required to make ‘offsetting’ work for the open access transition
2 references·8 citing·37 second hop
It’s the workflows, stupid! What is required to make ‘offsetting’ work for the open access transition (2017)It’s the workflows, stupid! What is requi…Scholarly journal publishing in transition- from restricted to open access (2017)Scholarly journal publishing …Offsetting and its discontents: challenges and opportunities of open access offsetting agreements (2017)Offsetting and its discontent…Impact of Transformative Agreements on Publication Patterns (2024)Impact of Transformative Agre…Promoting Open Access in Research-Performing Organizations: Spheres of Activity, Challenges, and Future Action Areas (2023)Promoting Open Access in Rese…The impact of open access publishing agreements at the University of Vienna in light of the Plan S requirements: a review of current status, challenges and perspectives (2020)The impact of open access pub…The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot (2020)The first Swedish Read & Publ…Monitoring open access publishing costs at Stockholm University (2019)Monitoring open access publis…Monitoring agreements with open access elements: why article-level metadata are important (2019)Monitoring agreements with op…Funding APCs from the research funder’s seat: Findings from the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot (2019)Funding APCs from the researc…Open Science Support as a Portfolio of Services and Projects: From Awareness to Engagement (2018)Open Science Support as a Por…The five competitive forces that shape strategy. (2008)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017 (2018)COVID-19 and the academy: It is time for going digital (2020)How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited (2020)Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access (2015)Disrupting the subscription journals’ business model for the necessary large-scale transformation to open access (2015)The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open‐access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article‐processing charges in combination with subscriptions (2015)Avoiding Predatory Journals and Questionable Conferences: A Resource Guide (2018)Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy (2018)Market share of the largest publishers in Journal Citation Reports based on journal price and article processing charge (2020)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Factors influencing researchers to publish in open-access: Is it a self-decision or a self-reinforcing cycle? (2022)Open Access Advantages as a Function of the Discipline: Mixed-methods Study (2023)Towards the SDGs for gender equality and decent work: investigating major challenges faced by Brazilian women in STEM careers with international experience (2023)Monitoring the transition to open access (2017)OpenAPC: a contribution to a transparent and reproducible monitoring of fee-based open access publishing across institutions and nations (2018)Investigating the Blind Spot of a Monitoring System for Article Processing Charges (2021)Open access policy (2013)A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany (2016)Situación del acceso abierto y los pagos por APC en Colombia. Un modelo de análisis aplicable a Latinoamérica (2022)The practical implementation of open access policies and mandates in Spanish public universities (2022)“The Best Home for This Paper”: A Qualitative Study of How Authors Select Where to Submit Manuscripts (2024)National licence negotiations advancing the open access transition – a view from Sweden (2018)The weakest link – workflows in open access agreements: the experience of the Vienna University Library and recommendations for future negotiations (2018)Of the rich and the poor and other curious minds: on open access and “development” (2007)A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science (2019)Austrian Transition to Open Access: a collaborative approach (2021)Open Access (2012)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The Diamond Model of Open Access Publishing: Why Policy Makers, Scholars, Universities, Libraries, Labour Unions and the Publishing World Need to Take Non-Commercial, Non-Profit Open Access Serious (2013)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals (2021)Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing (2025)The business of transformative agreements (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Scholarly journal publishing in transition- from restricted to open access72 cited
  • 2017Offsetting and its discontents: challenges and opportunities of open access offsetting agreements24 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Open Science Support as a Portfolio of Services and Projects: From Awareness to Engagement17 cited
  • 2024Impact of Transformative Agreements on Publication Patterns14 cited
  • 2019Funding APCs from the research funder’s seat: Findings from the EC FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot13 cited
  • 2023Promoting Open Access in Research-Performing Organizations: Spheres of Activity, Challenges, and Future Action Areas11 cited
  • 2019Monitoring open access publishing costs at Stockholm University11 cited
  • 2020The first Swedish Read & Publish agreement: An evaluation of the Springer Compact pilot10 cited
  • 2019Monitoring agreements with open access elements: why article-level metadata are important8 cited
  • 2020The impact of open access publishing agreements at the University of Vienna in light of the Plan S requirements: a review of current status, challenges and perspectives7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work